Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00887 ADDENDUM
Original file (BC-2011-00887 ADDENDUM.txt) Auto-classification: Approved
ADDENDUM TO
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:				DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2011-00887
      COUNSEL:  NONE
	                 				HEARING DESIRED:  NO

___________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 

He be awarded the Medal for Humane Action (MHA) for his participation in the Berlin Airlift.  

_________________________________________________________________

RESUME OF CASE:

On 15 September 2011, the Board considered and denied the applicant’s request to correct his record to reflect award of the MHA.  For an accounting of the facts and circumstances surrounding the applicant’s separation; and, the rationale of the earlier decision by the Board, see the Record of Proceedings (ROP) at Exhibit F.  

On 20 August 2012, the applicant, through his Senator, submitted a request for reconsideration for award of the MHA.

As new evidence, the applicant provides, a congressional inquiry from his Senator to the Air Force, a Troop Rotation Policy Letter, a letter from the Director of Personnel to the applicant’s spouse, cancelled envelopes from the applicant to his spouse, a Mess Pass, and a Frankfurt Military Post Pass.  

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit G.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

In earlier findings, the Board determined that there was insufficient evidence to warrant any corrective action.  After thoroughly reviewing the additional documentation submitted in support of his appeal and the evidence of record, we believe the applicant has overcome the rationale expressed in our previous decision.  In this regard, we note the applicant has provided a letter from his unit “personnel officer” indicating the applicant served with the Berlin Airlift.  While this may not be considered the normal official source document, we believe it is sufficient evidence to indicate he did participate in the Berlin Airlift and is entitled to award of the MHA.  Therefore, based on the foregoing, we recommend the applicant’s record be corrected as indicated below.  

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:

The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that on 14 April 1949, he was awarded the Medal for Humane Action for his participation in the Berlin Airlift.  

_________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered this application in Executive Session on 11 July 2013, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:

			                     , Panel Chair
			                     , Member
			                     , Member

All members voted to correct the records, as recommended.  The following documentary evidence for AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2011-00887 was considered:

    Exhibit F.  Record of Proceedings, dtd 4 Oct 06, w/Exhibits A 
                through E.
    Exhibit G.  Letter, Congressional Inquiry, dtd 20 Aug 12,                 w/atchs.




								                     
								Panel Chair


Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-02892

    Original file (BC-2003-02892.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 7 October 2003, AFPC/DPPPRA advised the applicant there is no indication in his records that he was recommended for award of the Air Medal for participation in flights for the Berlin Airlift. He also submitted a copy of the final letter of May 1953, indicating there were no records anywhere of him having been recommended for award of the Air Medal. The applicant has not provided any documentation to substantiate his claim or any justification for waiting until there would be no one who...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03672

    Original file (BC-2004-03672.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    DPPPR states that after a complete review of the applicant’s official military record and provided documentation, they were unable to verify his entitlement to the AM. The DPPPR evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: He applied for the AM at the suggestion of several Berlin Airlift veterans who had received the award for flying 100 missions or more on the Airlift. It is not awarded for peace...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03136

    Original file (BC-2004-03136.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPPR states after a complete review of the applicant’s personnel records and the documentation he provided, they were unable to determine his eligibility for the BS and PH. On 12 January 2005, the Board staff informed the applicant’s wife that during the time period in question her late-husband’s military service falls under the purview of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-03604

    Original file (BC-2012-03604.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03604 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. ________________________________________________________________ THE APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He should be awarded an additional AM based on his service which was highlighted in the Air Force Times, Berlin Airlift Veterans Association, and the Task...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC 2010 02805

    Original file (BC 2010 02805.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provided a copy of his 6 March 2008 letter to DFAS in which he claims he had requested SBP coverage be established for his wife “by the middle of June 2005.” However, DFAS records contain no evidence he submitted a valid request to elect SBP coverage for his wife within the first year of marriage. DPSIAR indicates the applicant’s intentions to provide SBP coverage for his wife are clear and apparently sincere; however, specific and timely action is required to elect SBP...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC 2004 01682 3

    Original file (BC 2004 01682 3.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The former service member’s surname and signature on the DD Form 149 dated 8 Nov 10 reflects “” The applicant via her congressional representative requested reconsideration to have her spouse’s records corrected to reflect his date of separation as 1 Jan 72 and his surname as “.” In response, the Board staff informed the applicant her request did not meet the criteria for reconsideration (Exhibit H). By virtue of a DD Form 149 dated 22 Oct 13, with attachments, the applicant requests...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-03006

    Original file (BC-2010-03006.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-03006 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ THE APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be entitled to the Berlin Airlift Device (BAD) (Administratively Corrected) and the Legion of Merit, with 2 Oak Leaf Clusters (LOM, w/2OLCs) (LOM, Administratively Corrected). We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-01990

    Original file (BC-2005-01990.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    DPPPR states to be awarded the PH, a member must provide documentation to support he was wounded as a direct result of enemy action and must have received medical treatment by medical personnel. Exhibit B. Exhibit E. Applicant's Response.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-00887

    Original file (BC-2012-00887.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 1 May 85 and 18 Nov 93, the Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) considered the applicant’s appeal to have her discharge upgraded; however, they concluded that the discharge was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and was within the discharge authority’s discretion, and denied her requests. Additionally, the applicant’s discharge was supported by three (3) Letters of Reprimand, three (3) Letters of Counseling, and other documents...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-03516

    Original file (BC-2012-03516.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    His DD Form 214, for the period 22 Nov 51 to 11 Aug 55, reflects he was awarded the following medals: the National Defense Service Medal, United Nations Service Medal, and the Korean Service Medal. We note the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR) has done a thorough review of the applicant’s military records and were unable to verify his entitlement to the aforementioned awards and decorations. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD...